|
HOME
BUSH
HOME
ARCHIVES
BUSH BLOG
BUSH ADS
ANTI-BUSH ADS
BUSH RECORD
BUSH -VS- BUSH
Funny Bush
Videos
POLITICAL WALLPAPER
POLITICAL LINKS
POLITICS
GUESTBOOK
|
|
|
|
|
My
Anti-Bush Blog |
| |
| As you
can tell I am not a supporter of George Bush and I have set up
my own BLOG to help me vent my frustration with is
Administration. I hope you will find my BLOG interesting. If
you would like to add comments to my BLOG please
e-mail them
to me and I will be happy to add them if I feel they are
appropriate. I welcome comments even if you disagree with me.
You can always post your comments to my
Guestbook. Thanks for
stopping by. |
| |
|
|
|
The Bush Administration is trying to scare the pubic into voting for them. They are running one misleading attack ad after another. The only way they can win this November is to paint John Kerry as weak. Read the whole story |
 |
| |
| |
|
|
Monday April 26, 2004 |
|
This Blog will be replaced with my new interactive WebBlog. Visit my new Blog and join the Blog. You can now add your comments and views I think you will find this pretty slick. |
|
Visit the Blog here |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Saturday April 24, 2003 |
|
The Bush White House has prohibited the press from showing images of our fallen soldiers returning home. The pentagon said this policy was out of respect for the families. Others believe that this policy is to sanitize the war. They are afraid if the public sees the constant flow of flag draped coffins, then support for this war would slip and people may start questioning why we are fighting this war in the first place. The website www.memoryhole.org successfully obtained the banned photos from the Air Force under the freedom of information act. After the White found out the Air Force had released 365 photos, the pentagon stopped the release of the photographs to anyone else.
Our troops who return home alive are greeted as heroes. Shouldn't our fallen troops be greeted as heroes also? I personally feel that these images are a tribute to the ultimate sacrifice made by these brave men. These photographs remind us of the real cost of war. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Friday April 23, 2004 |
|
Here they go again |
|
A Bush ad claims Kerry got "more special interest money than any other senator," which is false. While it is true that Kerry got $640,000 over the past 15 years from individual lobbyists. Bush campaign itself has reported raising $960,000 from individual lobbyists in the past year alone. The ad says Kerry got "millions from executives at HMO's, telecoms, drug companies," which is true -- for Kerry's entire political career. But so far Kerry's presidential campaign has received a small fraction of what the Bush campaign has received from those particular sources. By any definition, Bush's "special interest" money greatly exceeds Kerry's. Source FACTCHECK.ORG |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Thursday April 22, 2003 |
|
John Kerry releases military records |
|
In response to the bombardment from right wing pundits questioning John Kerry’s military service, the Kerry’s campaign released John Kerry’s military records yesterday. The records show Kerry was a highly praised commander credited with killing at least 20 enemy soldiers. How dare the Bush supporters question Kerry’s military service when their candidate jumped ahead of hundreds of applicants to hide in the Air National Guard during the Vietnam War? Kerry received three Purple Hearts, the Silver Star, the Bronze Star and the National Defense Service Metal. Can you name the combat metals George Bush received? Oh that’s right he didn’t see any combat, he hid in the Guard. How many combat metals did Dick Chaney Receive? Oh, that’s right he did serve in the military. How many combat metals did Donald Rumsfeld receive? Oh, he didn’t serve either. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Monday April 19, 2004 |
|
How did the President get this war on Iraq so wrong? |
|
See my newest article |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Sunday April 18, 2004 |
|
Bush illegally diverted 700 million dollars appropriated for the war on Afghanistan to plan the war in Iraq. This and other insights into the Iraqi war planning in the Bush White House will be addressed in an interview with Bob Woodard to night on 60 minutes. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Thursday April 15, 2003 |
|
The Bush tax cut |
|
The centerpiece of the Bush Administration economic stimulus program is his 33o billion tax cut. If you were to divide the number of new jobs created since the tax cut was passed, the cost per job created is over *423 million dollars per job. That price tag seems a little high to me since most of the jobs that were created are in the low wage, service sector. It would have made sense to have passed a public works bill where the American people would have actually received something for their money. The president is now promising to veto the highway bill which just passed congress. This highway bill would create good paying jobs and it would cost a lot less per job than the Bush tax cut. |
|
* 423 million dollars DOES NOT include the interest on the debt which is a direct result from the tax cuts. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Wednesday
April
14,
2004 |
|
Yesterday
I
made
some
predictions
of
what
Bush
was
going
to
say
in
his
press
conference.
I
did
a
pretty
good
job
except
he
did
not
use
the
term
“actionable
intelligence”
and
instead
of
using
the
phase
“moved
mountains”
he
used
“heaven
and
earth”. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Tuesday
April 13,
2004 |
|
George Bush
is planning
a prime time
press
conference
this
evening,
only the
twelfth of
his
presidency
(the lowest
of any
president
since the
advent of
television).
I can only
assume that
Bush is
having some
heartburn
about his
sinking poll
numbers and
is making
any attempt
to stop the
hemorrhaging.
I am going
out on a
limb and
make some
predictions
on what the
president
will say
during his
statement
and his
responses.
Bush will
-
Praise
the
troops
-
Show
sorrow
for the
loss of
life
-
Blame
some one
else for
the
recent
uprisings
in Iraq
(the
real
reason
is
administration
has no
real
plan for
occupying
Iraq)
-
Those
responsible
will be
brought
to
justice
-
He will
tell us
that
they new
that
their
would be
weeks
like
this (I
thought
we where
going to
be
greeted
as
liberators)
-
Will say
that the
U.S.
will
turn
governmental
control
over to
the
Iraqis
(even
though
he
doesn’t
know to
whom)
-
Praise
the 9/11
commission
(don’t
forget
he
opposed
the
commission’s
creation
and has
been
stonewalling
the
commission
every
step of
the way)
-
Will say
how the
administration
has been
cooperating
with the
9/11
commission
-
Will say
he would
have
“moved
mountains”
to
prevent
9/11
(soon as
he got
off
vacation)
-
Will say
that the
PDB had
no
“actionable
intelligence”
Not only did
Bush ignore
all PDB’S
and the
warnings
from the
CIA, FBI,
foreign
intelligence
services he
also ignored
the
Executive
Summary of
U.S.
Commission
on National
Security
Report. This
report was
finished on
1/31/01. You
should read
this report
it is scary
how dead on
this report
was.
Read the
report. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Monday April 12,
2004 |
|
When
asked about the lack
of action by the
administration in
lieu of the
controversial PDB
released this
weekend, Bush’s
response was
"I am satisfied that
I never saw any
intelligence that
indicated there was
going to be an
attack on America: a
time, and a place of
an attack," When I
saw his response I
just thought this
guy must be on
drugs. What
reasonable person
would buy this bull?
If you use the
president’s logic: I
guess we will not be
able to prevent
future terrorist
attacks unless we
have the date of the
attack, a specific
location, a
description of how
the attack is going
to be carried out, a
description of the
terrorists, and
their names. Oh,
their phone numbers
would be helpful.
Exactly how stupid
does Bush think we
are? Bush should
just admit he
screwed up. Stop
trying to defend and
cover up your
mistakes. Richard
Nixon was forced out
of office over the
cover up of
Watergate, not the
actual crime.
|
|
Posted by Eddie |
|
|
Monday April 12, 2004 |
|
When asked about the lack of action by the administration in lieu of the controversial PDB released this weekend, Bush’s response was "I am satisfied that I never saw any intelligence that indicated there was going to be an attack on America: a time, and a place of an attack," When I saw his response I just thought this guy must be on drugs. What reasonable person would buy this bull?
If you use the president’s logic: I guess we will not be able to prevent future terrorist attacks unless we have the date of the attack, a specific location, a description of how the attack is going to be carried out, a description of the terrorists, and their names. Oh, their phone numbers would be helpful.
Exactly how stupid does Bush think we are? Bush should just admit they screwed up. Stop trying to defend and cover up you mistakes. Richard Nixon was forced out of office over the cover up of Watergate, not the actual crime. |
|
|
| |
|
|
Saturday April 10, 2004 |
|
What did we learn from Rice’s testimony? Thursday morning was supposed to have been the big show down, Rice-vs-Clark. Condoleezza Rice was going to show the country that the White House did everything possible to prevent 9/11. She was going to tell us how the president took all those briefings he received about Bin Laden and terrorist threats seriously. She was going to show us that Richard Clark was a liar. She was going to show us that the president was not preoccupied with Iraq prior to 9/11.
Instead of taking a defensive posture, Dr. Rice and the administration should have just come clean and admitted that mistakes or misjudgments were made prior to 9/11. Instead the White House would like us to believe there were no warning signs prior to 9/11, but we know there were, the writing was on the wall, and for some reason the administration was looking the other way. Dr. Rice should have taken a lesson from Richard Clark, and made a simple apology to the 9/11 families, that would have gone a long way. Instead Dr. Rice had an air of arrogance which seems to be the theme for this administration. It seems that the White House has a policy to never apologize – never explain.
After Richard Clark released his book and before he testified before the 9/11 commission, the White House released the attack dogs to discredit him. Republicans and administration officials (including Condoleezza Rice) were calling him a liar, a disgruntled employee and an opportunist who is just trying to sell his book. Condoleezza Rice’s testimony was going to prove that Richard Clark was lying. Amazingly both Rice and Clark basically told the same story, the difference was the way each person spined their respective story.
Dr. Rice seemed to be combative at times and her memory seemed to be quite poor for a woman her age. Not to mention the fact that she confirmed the existence of the Aug. 6 Presidential Daily Briefing which spoke about Bin Laden plans to hijack planes and to blow up buildings. She confirmed that Richard Clark had asked for that meeting with the President and that the CIA Director briefed the president on a regular basis on the threat from the Bin Laden terrorist network.
If the FAA had known the Muslim extremists were planning to hijack planes, if the State and local governments knew terrorist were planning to blow up buildings, if the Immigration Department knew that the terrorist were moving freely in and out of the country, if the State Department knew about the terrorist threats (the fight school in Florida where some the terrorist learned to fly the planes required United States State Department clearance for aliens to enroll in classes), then September 11 may have turned out differently. Dr. Rice is probably correct; there was no silver bullet which could have prevented 9/11, but maybe if the administration hadn’t dismissed all the warning signs, I wouldn’t be writing this article today
The bottom line is the Terrorist who hijacked the planes on that beautiful September morning are to blame for the horror that took place on 9/11, but it would have been nice if we had the chance to change the events that day. What a different world we would be living in if September 11, 2001 was just an ordinary day in September. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Thursday April 8, 2004 |
|
Condoleezza Rice will be testifying today in public and under oath before the 9/11 commission. The eyes of the nation will be on her. I hope she is forth coming in her testimony. The American people have a right to know the truth.
American Soldiers have been in a battle for their lives the last few days in Iraq, and regrettably many of our brave men have lost that battle. The national security advisor is about to give a public testimony which may decide the Bush presidency, the administration still doesn't know who they are turning power over to in Iraq this June and where is the president? He is on vacation. Am I the only person who thinks this is strange? And you thought Michael Jackson was weird. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Wednesday, April 7, 2004 |
|

|
I was planning on posting some amusing events today, but the recent deaths of a least 12 U.S. soldiers could not pass with out comment. Let us all pray for the safety of all our troops and the families of our fallen troops. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Tuesday April, 6, 2003 |
|
One of George Bush’s biggest hurdles to reelection is the economy. Since Bush took office millions of Americans have lost their jobs. While employment figures have gained strength the past few months, the president is not out of the woods yet. Over one half of the new jobs which have been created under the Bush watch have been in the service sectors, which generally are low paying, without benefits.
Corporate profits are up, productivity is up, yet wages are stagnant. The rich get richer and the middle class can’t keep up with inflation. Read More |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Monday April 5, 2004 |
|

|
The official Pentagon death toll has now exceeded 600 troops. Well over half of the deaths have occurred after the President declared an end to major combat operations. Yesterday on the Sunday talk shows, Senator Richard Lugar said that the administration my need more troops in Iraq |
|
and that handing over control of the government may need to be delayed due to recent setbacks. The events since the fall of Iraq show that the administration had no real plan for reconstruction or an exit plan for our troops.
Why did we invade Iraq? Where are the weapons of mass destruction? Where are the mobile bio-weapons labs? Where are the nuclear weapons or weapons programs? Where are the ties to Al-Qaida? Where are the bio-weapon stockpiles? Where are the chemical weapon stockpiles? Where are the ties that Iraq had any thing to do with terrorism against the United States? Was invading Iraq in the best interests of the United States? |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Sunday April 4, 2004 |
|
Did the White Hose drop the ball on 9/11 ? |
|
Prior to September 11, 2001 the Bush administration received warnings almost on a daily basis that something like the events which occurred on 9/11 were immanent, but for some reason chose to ignore them. Information has been flowing out of Washington the past few months which show the administration had its head in the sand about the terrorist threats which faced our nation. On September 11, 2001 the National Security Advisor to the president was scheduled to give a speech outlining the security threats facing our nation. In that speech was not one word about Al-Qaida, Bin Laden or any other terrorist network. Mrs. Rice was going to say that the biggest threat facing the U.S. was ballistic missiles.
Three former administration insiders, an FBI translator, former Clinton Administration officials, and the CIA director all say that the administration was warned repeatedly about the immanent threats of terrorist using planes as missiles. During the Atlanta Olympics a plan was put in place for such a scenario. So when Administration officials say that 9/11 was inconceivable, they either have the world’s worst memory or they are lying.
Maybe this is way President Bush opposed the creation of the 9/11 Commission.
Mr. Bush has:
-
Refused to release copies of the security briefing he received prior to 9/11 to the commission.
-
Refused to let Ms. Rice testify in public under oath in front of the commission and later changed his mind due to public pressure.
-
Launched the attack dogs to discredit Richard Clark after his remarks supported the facts that Bush was warned repeatedly about 9/11.
-
Refused to release the Clinton Administration records about the potential terrorist threats.
-
Has refused to meet with the entire 9/11 commission, under oath, in public, instead Bush will meet with the chairman and vice-chairman in private for only one hour.
-
Will not release the minutes from the terrorism taskforce headed up by the Vice-President.
The more we learn about the behavior of this Administration before and after 9/11, it becomes apparent that they are a ship without a rudder. It seems that we are fed one lie after another. The story is always changing, our troops are dieing, our citizens are dieing, the world sees us as the greatest threat to peace, and we are no safer today then we were on September 10, 2001. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Saturday April 3, 2004 |
|
President Bush hailed data showing 308,000 new jobs were created last month, at the same time the unemployment rate for last month increased. Most of the jobs were created in the lower paying service industry, and many of those jobs are only part-time. This just goes to show you that figures can be misleading. President Bush, Americans need good paying, full time jobs with benefits. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Friday April 2, 2004 |
|
George Bush’s top 5 April fools jokes from Yesterday |
|
5) I am working hard to protect the environment |
|
4) We found weapons of mass destruction |
|
3) We found the people responsible for sending the anthrax in the mail |
|
2) My tax cuts for the wealthy have created millions of new jobs |
|
1) The world is a safer place today then when I took office |
|
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Thursday, April 1, 2004 |
|

|
|
Iraqis chant anti-American slogans as charred bodies hang from a bridge |
|
BAGHDAD, Iraq - In one of the bloodiest and most horrifying days since the end of the U.S.-led war in Iraq, five U.S. troops and four American civilian contractors were killed in separate attacks in the Sunni Triangle west of Baghdad. After an ambush on two vehicles carrying the civilian contractors in Fallujah, jubilant Iraqis burned and mutilated the dead, then dragged two corpses through the streets and hung them from a bridge spanning the Euphrates River. (Source NBC News) |
| |
|
Why can’t we protect Americans? The Administration would have us believe that we are winning the war on terrorism. Doesn’t lives of Americans abroad count? If this was happening to Americans on US soil the public would be outraged. It seems to me the administration has moved the attacks on Americans overseas, distancing the fight to make us feel more secure and giving us a false sense of security. When the administration asks US citizens to assist in the nation building effort in Iraq, we have a moral obligation to protect them. Remember the stories that we were told of how we were going to be greeted as liberators? Why are the Iraqis so full of hate towards Americans that they would mutilate the bodies of Americans and display them for all the world to see?
The administration is planning to turn governmental control over to the Iraqis in June. What type of government is going to put in place? Are Americans safer today then they were before the invasion of Iraq? Are Americans going to be safer in June then they are today?
God bless our troops and all the brave men and women who are harms way. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Wednesday, March 31 2004 |
|
I am pleased to hear of the White House’s decision to let Condoleezza Rice testify in public, under oath. I think the only reason the administration is letting Rice testify is because it did not have much choice. Like everything else surrounding 9/11 the administration says one thing, then gets painted into a corner and changes its mind. I guess that is what Republicans call “steady leadership.” I only hope that Rice answers all the questions put to her and does not invoke “executive privilege” too often during her testimony. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Tuesday March 30, 2004 |
|
|
Why won’t Condoleezza Rice testify in public under oath? |
|

The White still is refusing to let Condoleezza Rice testify in front of the 9/11 commission, in public, under oath. I do not know about you but I find this disturbing. It would seem that the White House would want the public to hear the sworn testimony of the National Security Advisor. The public has a right to hear what the White House knew prior to 9/11 and what they did with that information. What is this White House hiding? Richard Clark knows, and so do we.
Prior to 9/11 the vice-president headed two committees, one on terrorism and one on energy. Which committee do you think meet the most, the committee with the vice-presidents oil buddies or the one which dealt with protecting the public from terrorism? We know the answer to that question. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Monday March 29, 2004 |
|
Kerry takes aim at outsourcing, promises corporate tax cuts. |
|
Tax lawyers, accountants and economists were generally upbeat Friday in their reviews of John Kerry's proposal to make over the U.S. tax code. Economic experts said tax credits that make it cheaper to add workers or lower the cost of providing health care could encourage hiring. That is not good news for President Bush. Read the full story. |
|
|
|
Not finding “Weapons of Mass Destruction” in Iraq is not a laughing matter |
|
This past Wednesday during the National Correspondent Dinner President Bush made jokes which were accompanied by photos of him looking for weapons of mass destruction. Some in the audience may have found it funny hearing the president joking about not finding WMD’S, but I am not so sure the families of service men who are in harms way find this light heartedness amusing. WMD’S was the cornerstone of the administrations argument for the war in Iraq. Mr. President not finding “Weapons of Mass Destruction” in Iraq is not a laughing matter. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Sunday March 28, 2004 |
|
George Bush has stated in his campaign commercials that he has a plan for creating millions of jobs. The thing he forgets to mention is that the jobs are not in America. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Saturday
March
27,
2004 |
|
|
Will Bush
buy American
or go with a
European
joint
venture? |

Marine One,
that
helicopter
that you
always see
the
president
getting out
of on the
White House
lawn is
scheduled to
be replaced,
and my be
replaced
with a
chopper that
is not made
in America.
The Bush
Administration
has been
criticized
for standing
by and
watching
American
jobs leave
the country
at an
alarming
rate. Now
this
administration
is
considering
awarding the
15 billion
dollar
contract for
the next
generation
Marine One
to a foreign
joint
venture
contractor.
The awarding
of the
contract has
been put off
once and
will
probably be
put off
until after
the
election.
Why won’t
the
administration
announce its
decision
now? Because
it has
already made
up it mind
to go with
the foreign
firm and
making that
decision
public now
would just
reinforce
the sorry
record this
administration
has for
safeguarding
American
jobs. Mr.
Bush be a
man and
announce you
decision now
or are you
afraid the
American
people will
see you for
what you
really are,
a president
who does not
care about
the working
men and
women of
your own
country. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Friday March 26,
2004 |
|
President Bush's
campaign plans to
portray John Kerry
as a reckless
spender whose
promises would far
exceed his capacity
to pay for them. Did
I read this
correctly? This has
to be a joke.
How can Bush call
Kerry a reckless
spender, when he has
taken a budget
surplus and turned
it into the largest
deficit in history?
George Bush and the
Republican
controlled congress
are spending our
children’s money
like a bunch of
drunken sailors. The
arrogance and
self-denial of this
administration is
just sickening.
Bush pokes fun at
himself at dinner.
Thanks George, you
have saved me the
trouble. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, March 24, 2004 |
|
Gas prices are at record
highs, health care cost
through the roof, home cost
rising - This Bush doesn't
get it "it's the
economy stupid." |
|
 |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Wednesday March 23, 2004 |
|
Why won't Condoleezza Rice testify
to the 9/11 commission? We know why.
|
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Tuesday March 22, 2004 |
|
The following quotes are from
NBC news story posted on
the MSNBC website “The White House
launched a bitter attack Monday on President
Bush’s former counterterrorism adviser,
denouncing the ex-aide’s accusation that the
administration gave scant attention to al-Qaida
while being obsessed over Saddam Hussein.”
White House press secretary Scott McClellan
said the accusations by the former adviser,
Richard Clarke, were “more about politics and
book promotions than it is about policies.”
Does this sound familiar? If you do not like
the message destroy the messenger. Instead of
addressing why three members of the Bush inner
circle have turned on their former boss. They
all tell the same story. Attack Iraq at any
cost. Disregard the evidence. This latest
revelation is particularly disturbing, that
Bush ignored pre 9/11 warnings about the
potential threat from Al-Qaida.
Why would Richard Clark, a registered
Republican, who worked for four presidents
(three Republicans and one Democrat) lie? He
has no reason to lie. I believe Richard Clark
is a good man who could not stand by a watch
this administration carry on the policies of
deception which are endangering the safety of
Americans. Can someone disagree with this
Administration without being a liar?
I guess all of us who disagree with Bush are
liars. If you don’t believe me just ask anyone
in the administration. Like our president said
“you are either with us or against us.” I do
not know about you but I am sick and tired
having my patriotism, or my intelligence
questioned because I disagree with the
president.
There have been many casualties in this war on
terror. The truth maybe one of this war's
greatest casualties. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Monday March 22, 2004 |
|
Bush turns the White House into a Holiday Inn
for his biggest supporters! Remember all the
uproar over Bill Clinton having guest stay over in
the Lincoln Bedroom? This is what George Bush had
to say about the Clinton Lincoln Bedroom Scandal,
"I believe they've moved that sign, 'The buck
stops here,' from the Oval Office desk to 'The
buck stops here' on the Lincoln Bedroom. And
that's not good for the country." Once again bush
has said one thing and done another. President
Bush has played host to dozens of his closest
supporters at the White Hose as well as Camp
David. I wonder why the so called Liberal media
isn’t running with this story like it did with
Bill Clinton. Read more about this story
here. See the
list of people who stayed at the White House
here. I guess our
White House is for sale! |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Sunday March 21, 2004 |
|
Today is Sunday and that means talk shows. I guess the
Bush team will be sending all its men to hit the
Sunday talk show circuit to slander Kerry. The one
Bush team member or should I say ex-team member they
do not want you to see will be on 60 minutes tonight.
Richard A. Clarke said that during a meeting on
September 12, 2001 the administration wanted to bomb
Iraq, even though it was pointed out during that
meeting that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. This is
the third person in George Bush's inner circle to come
out and say Mr. Bush was determined to get Sadam no
matter what. Mr. Clark also basically says that this
administration was asleep at the wheel before 9/11.
Read the story or
even better watch
60 minutes tonight.
This is a
preview clip from
CBS. |
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Thursday,
March 18, 2004 |
|
The
Bush
Chaney website was caught selling fleece pullovers that
are made in Myanmar (Burma). Imports from Myanmar are ban,
and what makes it even worse the Bush Administration put
them on the list of banned countries. I have been saying
for years that George Bush does not care about U.S.
Workers and this is just action that proves it. This administration
and campaign never stops amazing me.
Yesterday,
Senator John McCain (R-AZ) said he did not believe
Democratic candidate John Kerry, a friend and Senate
colleague, was weak on defense or would compromise
national security. It was refreshing to see a Republican who is
honest. The White House needs to follow McCain's lead and
have an honest debate on the issues, not the mis-issues.
|
|
Posted by Eddie |
| |
|
|
Wednesday March
17, 2004 |
|
Welcome to my BLOG. Amazing
last week I didn’t even know what a BLOG was, now I have one.
My BLOG is dedicated to defeating George Bush. I will attempt
to have new entry every day which will have the latest news
and my opinions on our President. I guess I will start with
putting into words why I am so opposed to George Bush. Where
do I start?
Well let’s start with the
economy; during this administration 3.3 million jobs have been
lost. Bush’s top economic advisor has stated that the out
sourcing of US jobs is good for economy. Is this guy on Crack?
One third of a three trillion tax cut going to 2% of the
population, Bush’s plan to open our borders to job stealing
illegal immigrants, a green light for corporations to send
millions of good paying jobs out of the country, Bush’s plan
to screw millions of American workers out of overtime pay,
corporate corruption which has allowed Bush contributors to
steal billions from average Americans (but they got Martha
Stewart), and don’t forget this great jobless recovery. What
in the world is a jobless recovery? That is an oxymoron if I
ever heard one or may be it is just that Bush is a moron. Oh
and lets not forget about record high gasoline prices. How is
that possible when we are now controlling the world’s second
largest oil supply?
Let's talk
environment. This administration record on the environment
just sucks;
the Bush
administration has initiated more than 200 major rollbacks of
America's environmental laws, weakening the
protection of our country's air, water, public lands and
wildlife. Read this
article in Rolling Stone it
says it all.
Let’s talk lies. This administration has lied
since day one. Remember WMD, or this tax plan will create 2.5
million jobs. How about the lies he is saying in his
commercials, distorting
John Kerry’s record. There is
also “No Child Left Behind” which he refuses to fund. He says
he supports our troops while he is cutting Veterans benefits
and combat pay. This administration has the nerve to
say they never said that Sadam was an
imminent
threat.
How about Iraq was purchasing materials to build a nuke or
that Iraq was involved with 9-11. I could keep on going but I
don’t want to make this entry to long.
Let’s talk 9-11 and Homeland Security. Well I have already
talked about the lies which were used to sell the war. I feel
out involvement in Iraq is sealing resources needed to fight
the war on terror. Those troops could be use to secure our
borders, protect our airport and ports. I con not believe that
we are not trying to stop the flow of illegals from invading
our country from the south. If ten of thousands of Mexicans
can cross the border every week, so could terrorist. Was Sadam
a bad man? Yes, is the world better off without him? Yes, but
if use that argument then there are several other countries we
need to invade to make this world a better place. There were
and still is other countries which harbor and support
terrorist, such as Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the Sudan, these
countries were are larger threat to us than Iraq was. This
administration has failed to fund the first responders, which
has resulted budget crisis for every state and most large
cities. Don’t even get me started on the “Patriot ACT’, I
can’t believe how we are willing to give up or liberties for
feeling a little safer. Remember Patrick Henry? “Give me
liberty or give me death”
Well I guess that is enough for today.
|
|
Posted by Eddie |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|